PureWatts AI

    Solar energy assistant

    📍 Home

    Hi there! 👋

    I'm your PureWatts AI assistant. Ask me anything about solar energy, system sizing, or how to use the platform.

    Skip to content

    Solar glossary

    Capex (capital cost): what it means and why it matters

    The upfront cost of installing the system: panels, inverter, battery, mounting and labour.

    Why it matters in Nigeria

    Divided by system size it gives ₦/kWp, the single fastest way to sanity-check a quote against the local market.

    How PureWatts measures it

    Total Capex (Solar + battery)

    sum_sc2_capex_ngn

    Sum over the buildings in the group. Total install cost: PV + inverter + battery.

    Solar + battery: PV sized to cover FULL demand including round-trip losses: kwp = min(demand x (daylight + (1-daylight)/0.90) x 1.10 / net_yield, pv_max_kwp); battery = night demand / (0.80 DoD x sqrt(0.90)), capped at 2.0x PV kWp

    Sized to LATENT demand — the energy the building would use if it could. Against a cash baseline that only reflects today's spend this looks oversized; that is what sc3 exists to fix.

    Sum over the buildings in the group.

    Total Capex (Merit-order sized)

    sum_sc3_capex_ngn

    Sum over the buildings in the group. Total install cost: PV + inverter + battery.

    Solar + battery, merit-order sized: Same engine as sc2, but the target is what the building CONSUMES today x 1.5 (MO_SIZING_UPLIFT) rather than full latent demand.

    In Osun, sizing sc2 to latent demand while crediting it only with displacing current spend produced a 6x-oversized system and a negative IRR that said nothing about solar. sc3 is the fix, not an alternative opinion.

    Sum over the buildings in the group.

    See these numbers for your area

    Every state and local government area page reports capex (capital cost) for its own rooftops. Browse the Nigeria rooftop solar data.

    Related terms

    How these numbers are produced

    Approach A — energy value (upper bracket)

    Sizes the system to the building's full latent demand and values that energy at the mixed grid/generator tariff. It answers what the energy is worth — not what anyone currently pays.

    Approach B — cash saved (lower bracket)

    Sizes the system to demand that is actually served today, values it by merit order (solar displaces generator kWh first) and caps it at current spend. It answers what a building stops paying.

    Cohort: Viable rooftops (≥0.6 kWp potential).

    • Demand is modelled latent demand, not metered consumption.
    • Fuel is priced at ₦1,800/litre (operator-set). NBS reported ₦3,277/litre for May 2026 — on that basis every naira figure here is roughly 1.8× understated.
    • Generator ownership is a model output, not a survey result: it follows from the grid-availability scale and the 25% demand-suppression assumption.
    • Approach A prices energy nobody currently buys. Its savings must never be read as cash saved.
    • Demand is MODELLED LATENT demand, not metered consumption.
    • Generator ownership is model output, not survey.
    • Medians do not combine across groups — re-derive from the histograms.
    • Per-building files are float32 with 4 significant figures; cast to float64 before summing, because polars keeps Float32 sums in Float32.
    • Null scenario fields mean the roof cannot host 0.6 kWp, not zero savings.
    • `genset` was previously named `diesel` and now uses the segment's real fuel.
    • Ordering holds by construction: grid savings < mixed < genset.

    Frequently asked questions